(Copyright (c) 2005 Los Angeles Times)
Zahi Hawass moves through dim galleries at the Los Angeles County
Museum of Art, a sport-coated platoon leader walking the point on a
tense patrol.
The face so often smiling in television specials
about ancient Egypt is stern. The brown eyes that shine when he's
playing raconteur at sold-out lectures about the pyramids and pharaohs
radiate cold intensity as he inspects each object in "Tutankhamun and
the Golden Age of the Pharaohs."
"These monuments of Egypt are the heritage of
everyone," he says later, and he wants them seen in their best light.
Hawass is Egypt's chief antiquities official, the
man primarily responsible for the return of Tut's artifacts a
generation after they caused a sensation in American museums in the
1970s. Like an ancient high priest, he must see that the pharaoh's
touring treasures are properly arrayed.
Just as in the royal tombs, eternity is at stake.
But instead of trying to achieve immortality for Tut's body and soul,
Hawass wants to speed the rebirth of a torpid bureaucracy on whose
vigor the future of Egyptian antiquity depends.
The Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, which
Hawass leads as secretary general, is responsible for the country's
monuments and museums. But it has long been overshadowed by Europeans
and Americans, who have the leading schools of Egyptology and, before
Hawass, had run their digs with few restrictions from the impoverished
host country.
Now, some Westerners are grumbling about his
policies -- especially in England, where his 2003 call for the return
of the iconic Rosetta Stone caused alarm. But many are applauding too.
Hawass requires archeologists to concentrate on conserving what
they've found, rather than digging for new discoveries. And in a field
where some love digging more than writing, he insists that finds be
published within five years. Otherwise, permit-holders lose the right
to keep digging. The result -- less glamour, more desk work, more
expense -- has not endeared Hawass to everyone, and his outsized ego
makes him an easy target. But experts say that speedy publication
expands knowledge and that conservation is a must.
To Hawass, it's all essential if he's to preserve
his country's heritage while molding the 30,000-employee antiquities
council into a modern priesthood of archeologists, educators and art
conservators who will at last make Egypt a leading force in the
discovery, protection and display of its ancient riches. He counts on
Tut to generate the cash and publicity needed to give his ambitious
program a push. Egypt already has received $20 million upfront; he
hopes to increase that to $36 million by the end of the 27-month,
four-city U.S. tour.
At 58, Hawass has been in charge for three years,
with just five more to solidify his initiatives before law mandates he
retire. And so, the return of Tut is his moment too. Detractors decry
his famous self-promotion; admirers counter that it's his passion and
personality that make him effective. Perhaps, they say, his greatest
contribution may be that, for the first time, the face of Egyptology
is Egyptian.
Hawass is known as an entertaining and exuberant
promoter of his nation's antiquities, but to archeological insiders he
also is a free-swinging and sometimes autocratic wielder of power.
At the National Geographic Society, where he holds
the title of explorer-in-residence, he is known as "The Pharaoh" --
partly, says Tim Kelly, president of the organization's TV division,
because he is given to occasional joking threats: "Do this, or I will
cut off your head!"
Hawass says nothing as he walks LACMA's Tut layout
for the first time, apart from exchanges in Arabic with his six
assistants from the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. Then, he enters the
final gallery, housing a photographic display dubbed "The Face of
Tutankhamun." He stops short, glares from across the room at a latex
bust of Tut -- and decides in an instant that he must cut off
somebody's head. Specifically, the boy king's. This time, he is not
joking.
The Tut head is meant to be the last object in the
show, as laid out by its American producers and designers. National
Geographic, the tour's creative sponsor, has provided the piece de
resistance from a recent TV special in which Hawass presided over the
first CT scan of Tut's mummy. Crafted by a French sculptor and
forensic anthropologist who worked from the scan, the face already is
famous, thanks to television and the cover of this month's National
Geographic magazine.
Never mind all that. On this day, the exhibition's
opening -- on June 16 -- is just three days away. The model belongs
not in a display case, but "in the toilet," Hawass says, shocking an
entourage that includes officials from the tour's corporate funder,
AEG, and its designer, Arts and Exhibitions International. It's not an
authentic art object, he complains, and it's not historic.
"This is an art exhibition. You don't ruin it with
speculation." The head can be seen, he decides, but only in
photographs. "Then it's perfect."
It's a classic Zahi moment. The sort that puts a
fond chuckle in Dorothea Arnold's voice as she speaks by phone from
her office at New York's Metropolitan Museum, where she heads the
Egyptian art department.
"He's a full person, a full human," says Arnold,
who has known Hawass since the 1970s, when she worked on German
archeological digs in Egypt. "He's very jolly and very nice to be
with, but also he can be very angry. He's not your careful person, and
sometimes maybe he goes a bit over. But that's what makes him so
inspiring. If you have an outstanding person, maybe you have to live
through some more spectacular moments."
Salima Ikram, a Pakistani-born, Bryn Mawr- and
Cambridge- educated professor at the American University in Cairo, has
worked with Hawass over the last eight years on a variety of projects.
She says he can be dictatorial, egotistical and just plain wrong, and
he tends to drive his staff and everyone else mercilessly. But he will
listen -- really listen -- to those strong enough to stand up to him
and make a cogent case for an idea or opinion that contradicts his
own. He seeks advice, and logic can win him over.
"It's what makes him charming, as opposed to a pain
in the butt," Ikram says.
Hawass' ability to enthrall an audience ranks with
an Egyptian flute player's skill at charming a cobra. When he was a
small boy, his father would send him -- on the festive nights
following the introspective days of Ramadan -- to a sheik who told
stories.
Sitting barefoot in a Washington, D.C., hotel room
-- to commence the national media blitz before the L.A. opening --
Hawass recalls what it was like to be an overactive 8-year-old gripped
by stillness for two hours while an old man told tales from "Arabian
Nights."
"I learned from this man the way that you can make
people listen," he says.
*
He talks, people listen
A few hours later, several hundred people are
listening, laughing, then listening some more as Hawass talks about
Tut in an auditorium at National Geographic's Washington headquarters.
His accent is heavy, his English syntax sometimes skewed. But his
delivery engages.
Summing up the intrigue and mystery surrounding Tut,
he says: "It's like a play that we don't know the end of the play."
But the recent CT scan has filled in a few blanks. "This machine can
change the dead to be alive."
The voice moves from piercing staccato when he's
being emphatic or argumentative, to smooth and languid in moments of
transport. His energy and focus are unflagging. It's like encountering
the Arab equivalent of a first-class Irish yarn spinner. There is no
lack of blarney.
Hawass considers himself a scientist and a scholar.
His 1987 doctorate in Egyptology from the University of Pennsylvania
says he is, and he has made significant discoveries in his 37-year
career with the Supreme Council -- especially the tombs of the workers
who built the pyramids.
But he's also a showman, an entertainer who knows
which routines will grab 'em. "There is no mummy's curse," he'll
declare simply. Then he'll detail all the spooky legends that gave
rise to belief in a curse, and relate the many near-disasters and
eerie coincidences in his own life. The mummy's curse, for Hawass, is
what a ball of yarn is to a cat: so easy to unravel and tear apart,
but since that would end all the fun, why not just keep poking at it
and let it roll?
What enchants on TV doesn't play well in some
academic circles, says Dennis Forbes, who as editorial director of KMT:
A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt, has watched -- and sometimes
published -- Hawass since launching the quarterly in 1990.
"Some people [think] that a true scholar isn't
supposed to be a star," Forbes says. "He's wined and dined and
lionized," but that can leave him open to barbs and eye-rolling from
the Egyptological cognoscenti.
"Zahi is known for making grand statements that
have no basis," Forbes says, such as the oft-repeated contention that
70% of Egyptian antiquity still lies buried and waiting to be
discovered. Nevertheless, the North Carolina-based editor counts
himself firmly in Hawass' corner. "In my experience, he's the first
[antiquities chief] who has really had an impassioned attitude toward
the job. He's out there. He's everywhere. How he has the energy to do
these things is beyond many people's understanding."
Lorelei H. Corcoran, director of the Institute of
Egyptian Art and Archeology at the University of Memphis in Tennessee,
says she and her students chuckle sometimes at Hawass' romantic
pronouncements. But she wouldn't want him to trade his effusiveness
for scholarly caution.
"It's a means to attract attention, excite
enthusiasm and gain support for the prosaic things we do every day,"
she says.
If Hawass is a master at outreach, he's a black
belt at infighting.
His loftiest target has been Dietrich Wildung, an
eminent scholar who runs the Egyptian Museum in Berlin. In 2003,
Hawass announced that Egyptian police had a tape of known antiquities
thieves talking about the kinds of things Wildung would be willing to
buy from them for his museum's collection.
"The ... authorities have incontrovertible evidence
that he was involved in the illegal trafficking and buying of
antiquities," Hawass wrote in his column for the English edition of
the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram. But when asked why Egypt, two years
later, still hasn't moved to indict Wildung -- as Italian authorities
recently did in bringing a case against Marion True, the J. Paul Getty
Museum's curator of antiquities -- Hawass acknowledges that the tapes
are hearsay that can't prove a case.
Wildung, once friendly with Hawass, is now banned
from excavating in Egypt but denies any wrongdoing. He says Hawass is
playing to Egyptian public opinion and perhaps retaliating because
Wildung criticized him for empty showmanship on a 2001 TV special that
put a robot into a pyramid. "For populistic reasons, he has
unfortunately invented these stories, which are 500% against my
personal conviction and my understanding as a museum professional,"
Wildung says from his Munich home.
Hawass and his supporters say that banning
foreigners if they break the rules -- as he has done in several cases
besides Wildung's -- puts teeth behind policies that are in the best
interest not only of Egypt, but also of scholarship and preservation.
Others express concern that the big stick the secretary general wields
could beat down debate and dissent. An archeologist on the periphery
of one of Hawass' battles refuses to talk about him: "I plan to go
back to Egypt, and I don't want anything that could hold that up."
Within Egypt, Hawass has been brawling lately with
critics who question the methodology of the CT scan of Tut's mummy,
and the forensic re-creation of his face. Hawass curbed the authority
and docked the pay of one persistent foe, Ahmed Saleh, an
archeological inspector for the Supreme Council who complained, among
other things, that the procedures used in the facial re-creation made
Tut look Caucasian, disrespecting the nation's African roots.
Hawass insists he is not angry, vindictive or power
mad; firm enforcement of the rules is essential to prevent chaos, he
says, given the hundreds of ongoing archeological projects in Egypt
and the continued threat of antiquities theft.
"Yes, it's inflammatory," Willeke Wendrich, a UCLA
professor of Egyptian archeology, says of Hawass' willingness to
attack perceived rule breakers in the press and ban them from
excavating. "Maybe cooperation would be better served if he formulated
things slightly differently. But it's counterbalancing what has been
going on too long, a colonialist attitude that hasn't disappeared even
now. I think the way he acts is partly his personality, but it's
partly a reaction to a very arrogant treatment of Egyptians and
Egyptian officials."
*
Pondering his legacy
In retirement, Hawass -- married to a gynecologist
and father of two sons, a physician and a businessman -- says he looks
forward to the less grueling and contentious pursuit of writing up his
discoveries for scholarly publication. He hopes to spend more time in
L.A., where for six summers, from 1996 to 2001, he was a visiting
professor in UCLA's department of Near Eastern languages and cultures.
He says the greatest monument he will leave behind is a growing
Egyptian corps of well-trained, highly motivated and better- paid
archeologists, museum curators, antiquities guards and business
managers who can carry on a vision that, ultimately, is too big for
one man and one life's work.
Ikram, the Cairo-based professor, who is on the
editorial board of a scholarly journal published by the Supreme
Council, says that Pharaonic antiquity has meant little to most
Egyptians and the pyramids have been nothing but a good place to
picnic. But that began to change, she says, on the night in 2001 when
Hawass went on live TV to send a little robot through a previously
unexplored passageway in the Great Pyramid of Khufu at Giza.
"My maid said, 'Oh my God, did you see that
program? Do you see what we have in the pyramids?' " Ikram recalls.
"For the first time, there's identification, a great deal of pride and
awareness."
As she left for a day of teaching university
students and planning museum displays, Ikram says her maid, who
previously had shown no interest in her employer's job, said something
surprising for an Egyptologist to hear in the land whose ancient
history and culture Egyptologists study.
"I'm glad you're doing what you're doing." |